![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frame and Fork types |
No Fork (frame weight) |
With Fork (Fork Weight) |
| Litespeed Ti (Eddy Merx) |
2.46 mm (1.44 kg) |
|
with carbon Time forks |
|
1.99 mm (658g) |
with steel forks |
|
1.58 mm (604g) |
|
|
|
Look KG251 carbon |
2.00 mm (1.52 kg) |
|
+ Look carbon-forks |
|
1.78 mm (558g) |
|
|
|
Dawes 300 GIRO steel |
2.19 mm (2.51 kg) |
|
+ steel forks |
|
1.81 mm (913g) |
|
|
|
GT ZR1000 (Al) |
2.24 mm (1.47 kg) |
|
+ EDGE Carbon Forks |
|
1.65 mm (634g) |
|
|
|
Alan Bonded Aluminium |
1.97 mm (1.72 kg) |
|
+Alan Al forks |
|
1.60 mm (554g) |
|
|
|
Fort 7005 Al (track frame) |
2.19 mm (1.74 kg) |
|
+Cr-Mo Sanko forks |
|
1.81 mm (704g) |
|
|
|
Omega 853 steel |
1.65 mm (1.70 kg) |
|
+ Gios Team steel forks |
|
1.49 mm (542g) |
|
|
|
"Raleigh" Timet titanium |
1.47 mm (1.69kg) |
|
+ Ambrosio A7s forks |
|
1.31 mm (682g) |
|
|
|
Cannondale Caad 3 |
1.73 mm (1.42kg) |
|
+ Time forks |
|
1.50 mm (531g) |
|
|
|
Peugeot steel cyclo cross frame with o/size down tube. |
1.74 mm (2.36kg) |
|
+ steel forks |
|
1.54 mm (1011g) |
|
|
|
Carbon fibre TT fame with o/size tubing |
1.53 mm (1.63kg) |
|
+ carbon TT forks |
|
1.51 mm (563g) |
|
|
|
Peugeot 531 steel double butted with brazed lugs |
1.48 mm (1.95kg) |
|
+531 steel forks |
|
1.30 mm (686g) |
|
|
|
TREK OCLV 120 |
1.65 mm (1.21kg) |
|
+ Air rail carbon forks |
|
1.59 mm (505g) |
|
|
|
Comments
As can be seen:-
1. The presence of the forks usually reduces bottom bracket deflection; however in oversize carbon frames fitted with carbon forks this increase is very small.
2. The type of fork influences the bottom bracket deflection and in the case of the titanium frame the aerodynamic carbon forks gave more deflection than the lighter conventional steel forks.
3. The oversize aluminium frame (GT) was not as stiff as the bonded Alan frame that used much smaller tube sections.
4. The stiffest frame tested to date is a titanium frame with a very oversized aero-section down tube.
5. A conventional 531 steel frame gave the third least deflection and was stiffer than almost all the modern frames, although considerably heavier.
Page 2 for Images of frame test set-up
Visit the departments Component Failure Museum for examples of bike part failures.
If you have any comments about these tests
please contact i.norman@open.ac.uk
.
Page last modified 15-Jan-2008
Copyright ; All material
on this web page is Copyright © Materials Engineering unless otherwise
stated.
Material from this website must not be reproduced without the explicit
written permission of the Head of Department.